It was probably not supported since quite some time anyhow, because wx
own code uses CallAfter() which wouldn't compile with it, but now we can
can get rid of wxHAS_CALL_AFTER checks too.
Disabling -Wsuggest-override inside macros is broken in gcc, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55578, and has started
affecting wxWARNING_SUPPRESS_MISSING_OVERRIDE since gcc 11, i.e. this
macro doesn't have any effect any more and the warning is still given.
Avoid it by actually specifying "override" for gcc 11 (as doing it for
all compilers would result in -Winconsistent-missing-override from
clang) and check that we don't get this warning in the allheaders test.
Also don't use wxDECLARE_ABSTRACT_CLASS() inside wxObject itself, now
that it uses "override", which is not appropriate for the base class
version. This is arguably more clear and should have been done like this
since the beginning anyhow.
We still can't avoid defining the overload taking NativeFormat due to an
ambiguity that we would have otherwise between converting from
NativeFormat to wxDataFormat or vice versa when comparing them (it would
have been better to avoid implicit conversions in all directions, of
course, but this is how it was done back in e1ee679c2e (wxDataObejct and
related changes (won't compile right now), 1999-10-21) and it's too late
to change it now), but we can at least define an overload taking
wxDataFormat itself and not wxDataFormatId to make things slightly more
logical and avoid -Wambiguous-reversed-operator clang 12 warnings.
Taking wxFont here resulted in a potential ambiguity when comparing
wxFont objects, at least according to clang 12 in C++20 mode.
Avoid this by just taking wxFontBase here, as now the operator is fully
symmetric, rather than exactly matching only (wxFontBase, wxFont) and
matching (wxFont, wxFont) either directly or with reversed arguments
order.
Move this function, and the associated constant, to common code.
This required moving wxSpinCtrlDouble::Create() implementation to the
source file, but there are no real changes.
wxSpinCtrlDouble::SetIncrement() should increase the number of digits if
necessary because not doing it would be inconsistent with the initial
determination of the number of digits in the ctor and would actually
lose the digits displayed, but it seems unnecessary to decrease the
number of digits and it might be surprising, so don't do it.
Add a test for this behaviour and document it.
This is consistent with using the value of the increment specified in
the ctor for setting the initial number of digits, it was surprising
that creating the control with some value of the increment (e.g. 0.1)
and calling SetIncrement(0.1) later resulted in very different outcomes,
as in the former case the value was shown with a digit after the period
while in the latter case only the integer part was shown.
This also makes the behaviour compatible with that of the previous
versions of the generic wxSpinCtrlDouble, which used "%g" to format the
number before the changes of edc553870f (Fix displaying wxSpinCtrlDouble
values with default precision, 2020-05-18), as they did show the
fractional part even in the latter case.
Add a test checking that this works as expected: before this commit, the
test failed with "1 == 1.2" and "1 == 1.23" errors.
Make this part of SetDigits() reusable in order to be able to also use
it in DetermineDigits() now and in SetIncrement() in the upcoming
commit.
No real changes yet.
It doesn't seem right to leave it unchanged when increment is outside of
[0, 1] interval, we should still set it to something in this case.
And doing this makes it unnecessary and redundant to initialize m_format
in Init(), as it will be always done when DetermineDigits() is called
from Create() anyhow.
Ctor of a template class specialization shouldn't actually repeat the
specialized template arguments, as it was done in 65cbf40b7e (Add
wxNO_UNSAFE_WXSTRING_CONV2 macro, 2019-10-21), so remove them because
this doesn't compile with g++ 11, even though it (wrongly?) did with the
previous gcc versions.
Arithmetic operations on the elements of different enums are deprecated
in C++20 and the latest compiler versions warn about them.
While individual warnings could be fixed in wxWidgets itself (although
it would be quite an effort to do it for all ~500 of them), it wouldn't
help with the same warnings in the applications using wx, so prefer to
do it by explicitly defining the operations on the enums that can be
combined with each other by using wxALLOW_COMBINING_ENUMS() macro,
except for a single warning in wxTar code where it's easier to just not
use an anum at all.
C++20 deprecates arithmetic operations with the elements of different
enums and at least clang 10 and MSVS 2019 already warn about this when
compiling in C++20 mode, so avoid such operations at least in the public
headers to avoid warnings in the applications using wxWidgets and C++20.
In addition to linking with Winsock 2, also use winsock2.h.
This allows to turn on IPv6 support on by default under MSW, so turn it
on under Unix too for consistency.
Predefine _WINSOCK_DEPRECATED_NO_WARNINGS to avoid warnings about
deprecated (but still available and very unlikely to be ever removed)
Winsock 1 functions that we still use.
This requires manually sending the original key event back to the native
control because NSOutlineView doesn't implement the NSTextInputClient
protocol and so doesn't allow handling the keys in the usual way.
Fixes this warning:
In file included from ../../include/wx/html/helpctrl.h:19,
from ../../include/wx/help.h:27,
from ../../include/wx/cshelp.h:18,
from ../../tests/allheaders.h:85,
from ../../tests/allheaders.cpp:435:
../../include/wx/html/helpfrm.h:74:50: error: declaration of 'wxWindowID' shadows a global declaration [-Werror=shadow]
74 | wxHtmlHelpFrame(wxWindow* parent, wxWindowID wxWindowID,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../../include/wx/wxprec.h:12,
from ../../tests/testprec.h:4,
from ../../tests/allheaders.cpp:433:
../../include/wx/defs.h:1965:13: note: shadowed declaration is here
1965 | typedef int wxWindowID;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
See https://trac.wxwidgets.org/ticket/19153
The entered text wasn't taken into account, as the override was still
used when its numeric value was retrieved by GtkSpinButton using our
"input" handler, so reset the override now as soon as we get "changed"
signal.
Make it possible to use a string value different from the numeric value,
as wxMSW version allows this and some existing code depends on it.
Closes#19140.
No real changes yet, just refactor the code to always connect these
signals handlers and not just when using non-decimal base.
Add wxSpinCtrl::GTKInput() and GTKOutput() virtual methods to handle
these signals appropriately depending on the type of the control.
This will allow further customizing conversion to/from string in the
upcoming commit and will also make it possible to handle UI locale
different from the C locale in the future.
The field is used for common placement and sizing logic in
notebook-like controls that have a "controller buddy" control. Its use
isn't wxControl-specific and only relies on wxWindow API, so the
restriction to wxControl-inherited types is arbitrary.
Change the type to the more general wxWindow* pointer.
In practical terms, this allows derived classes to use e.g.
wxNativeWindow as the controller buddy.
This allows to retrieve the current contents of the text entry part of
wxSpinCtrl.
For now provide a stub in the base class, will be made pure virtual
later.
Co-Authored-By: Vadim Zeitlin <vadim@wxwidgets.org>
Introduced in 53bd139, wxReadlink() trivially wraps readlink(), but
returned int instead of ssize_t as defined for readlink() by POSIX.
Fixes "Implicit conversion loses integer precision: 'ssize_t' (aka
'long') to 'int'" on platforms with sizeof(ssize_t)>sizeof(int).
This just uses the existing wxImage ctor from XPM data and wxCursor ctor
from wxImage, but will allow the code creating cursors from XPM to still
work even when wxImage ctor from XPM is made explicit.
Add a trivial test just to check that the new ctor can be used.
Use the same name as in the other ports for the function doing the same
thing, there doesn't seem to be any good reason to name it differently.
Also avoid declaring it when wxUSE_IMAGE==0 as it's not defined in this
case (again, consistently with the other ports).
wxGTK already did it like this, but also only declared ctor not taking
wxImage in this case, while wxMSW and wxMac declared this ctor in any
case, even when wxUSE_IMAGE==0, but didn't define it then.
This doesn't matter much anyhow, as the build with wxUSE_IMAGE==0 is
clearly broken and these changes are not enough to fix it, but be at
least somewhat consistent and:
1. Don't declare methods using a class which is not available at all.
2. Do define methods using wxImage only internally, even if they do
nothing when it's not available.
No real changes.
