Use switch over enum-valued variable rather than "if"s
No real changes, just make sure we use an (exhaustive) switch rather than a less obvious sequence of if statements.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -680,19 +680,24 @@ void wxWebResponseImpl::ReportDataReceived(size_t sizeReceived)
|
||||
m_readBuffer.UngetAppendBuf(sizeReceived);
|
||||
m_request.ReportDataReceived(sizeReceived);
|
||||
|
||||
if ( m_request.GetStorage() == wxWebRequest::Storage_File )
|
||||
switch ( m_request.GetStorage() )
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_file.Write(m_readBuffer.GetData(), m_readBuffer.GetDataLen());
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if ( m_request.GetStorage() == wxWebRequest::Storage_None )
|
||||
{
|
||||
wxWebRequestEvent evt(wxEVT_WEBREQUEST_DATA, m_request.GetId(), wxWebRequest::State_Active);
|
||||
evt.SetDataBuffer(m_readBuffer.GetData(), m_readBuffer.GetDataLen());
|
||||
m_request.GetHandler()->ProcessEvent(evt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
case wxWebRequest::Storage_Memory:
|
||||
// Nothing to do, just keep appending data to the buffer.
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
if ( m_request.GetStorage() != wxWebRequest::Storage_Memory )
|
||||
m_readBuffer.Clear();
|
||||
case wxWebRequest::Storage_File:
|
||||
m_file.Write(m_readBuffer.GetData(), m_readBuffer.GetDataLen());
|
||||
m_readBuffer.Clear();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case wxWebRequest::Storage_None:
|
||||
wxWebRequestEvent evt(wxEVT_WEBREQUEST_DATA, m_request.GetId(), wxWebRequest::State_Active);
|
||||
evt.SetDataBuffer(m_readBuffer.GetData(), m_readBuffer.GetDataLen());
|
||||
m_request.GetHandler()->ProcessEvent(evt);
|
||||
m_readBuffer.Clear();
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
wxString wxWebResponseImpl::GetDataFile() const
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user