git-svn-id: https://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk@35608 c3d73ce0-8a6f-49c7-b76d-6d57e0e08775
		
			
				
	
	
		
			370 lines
		
	
	
		
			17 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			370 lines
		
	
	
		
			17 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
	
	
| 
 | |
| <HTML>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <HEAD>
 | |
| <TITLE>wxWidgets FAQ: General</TITLE>
 | |
| </HEAD>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <BODY BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF TEXT=#000000 VLINK="#00376A" LINK="#00529C" ALINK="#313063">
 | |
| 
 | |
| <font face="Arial, Lucida Sans, Helvetica">
 | |
| 
 | |
| <table width=100% border=0 cellpadding=3 cellspacing=0>
 | |
| <tr>
 | |
| <td bgcolor="#004080" align=left height=24 background="images/bluetitlegradient.gif">
 | |
| <font size=+1 face="Arial, Lucida Sans, Helvetica" color="#FFFFFF">
 | |
| <b>wxWidgets FAQ: General</b>
 | |
| </font>
 | |
| </td>
 | |
| </tr>
 | |
| </table>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| See also <a href="faq.htm">top-level FAQ page</a>.
 | |
| <hr>
 | |
| <h3>List of questions in this category</h3>
 | |
| <ul>
 | |
| <li><a href="#whatis">What is wxWidgets?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#licence">Can I use wxWidgets for both proprietary projects, and GPL'ed projects?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#support">Is there support?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#users">Who uses wxWidgets?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#platforms">What platforms are supported by wxWidgets?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#specific">How does wxWidgets support platform-specific features?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#stl">Does wxWidgets use STL? or the standard string class?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#richedit">Is there a rich edit/markup widget for wxWidgets?</a></ li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#exceptions">How to use C++ exceptions with wxWidgets?</a></ li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#dev">How is wxWidgets being developed?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#distrib">How is wxWidgets distributed?</a></li>
 | |
| <!--
 | |
| <li><a href="#future">What are the plans for the future?</a></li>
 | |
| -->
 | |
| <li><a href="#base">What is wxBase?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#univ">What is wxUniversal?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#jave">What about Java?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#dotnet">What about .NET/Mono?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#help">How can I help the project?</a></li>
 | |
| <li><a href="#newport">How do I start a new port?</a></li>
 | |
| </ul>
 | |
| <hr>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="whatis">What is wxWidgets?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| wxWidgets is a class library that allows you to compile graphical C++ programs on a range of
 | |
| different platforms. wxWidgets defines a common API across platforms, but uses the native graphical user interface (GUI) on each platform,
 | |
| so your program will take on the native 'look and feel' that users are familiar with.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Although GUI applications are mostly built programmatically, there are several dialog editors to help
 | |
| build attractive dialogs and panels. Robert Roebling's <a href="http://www.roebling.com">wxDesigner</a>
 | |
| and Anthemion Software's <a href="http://www.anthemion.co.uk/dialogblocks/" target=_new>DialogBlocks</a>
 | |
| are two commercial examples, but there are others: see the <a href="lnk_tool.htm">Useful Tools</a> page.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| You don't have to use C++ to use wxWidgets: there is a <a href="http://wxpython.org">Python interface</a> for wxWidgets,
 | |
| and also a <a href="http://wxperl.sourceforge.net" target=_top>Perl interface</a>.
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <h3><a name="licence">Can I use wxWidgets for both proprietary (commercial) projects, and GPL'ed projects?</a></h3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Yes. Please see the <a href="newlicen.htm">licence</a> for details, but basically
 | |
| you can distribute proprietary binaries without distributing any source code, and neither will wxWidgets
 | |
| conflict with GPL code you may be using or developing with it.
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| The conditions for using wxWidgets are the same whether you are a personal, academic
 | |
| or commercial developer.
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <h3><a name="support">Is there support?</a></h3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| No official support, but the mailing list is very helpful and some people say that
 | |
| wxWidgets support is better than for much commercial software. The developers are
 | |
| keen to fix bugs as soon as possible, though obviously there are no guarantees.
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="users">Who uses wxWidgets?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many organisations - commercial, government, and academic - across the
 | |
| world. It's impossible to estimate the true number of users, since
 | |
| wxWidgets is obtained by many different means, and we cannot monitor
 | |
| distribution. The mailing list contains around 300-400 entries which is
 | |
| quite large for a list of this type.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| See <a href="users.htm">Users</a> for a list of some users and their applications, and
 | |
| also <A href="feedback.htm">Feedback</a> for comments.<P>
 | |
| Our highest-profile user yet is industry veteran and Lotus Corp. founder Mitch Kapor
 | |
| and his <a href="http://www.osafoundation.org" target=_new>Open Source Applications Foundation</a>.
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="platforms">What platforms are supported by wxWidgets?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <ul>
 | |
| <li>Windows 3.1, Windows 95/98, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows ME.
 | |
| <li>Linux and other Unix platforms with GTK+.
 | |
| <li>Unix with Motif or the free Motif clone Lesstif.
 | |
| <li>Mac OS.
 | |
| <li>Embedded platforms are being investigated. See the <a href="wxuniv.htm">wxUniversal</a> project.
 | |
| <li>An OS/2 port is in progress, and you can also compile wxWidgets for GTK+ or Motif
 | |
| on OS/2.
 | |
| </ul>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="specific">How does wxWidgets support platform-specific
 | |
| features?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is a hotly-debated topic amongst the developers. My own philosophy
 | |
| is to make wxWidgets as platform-independent as possible, but allow in a
 | |
| few classes (functions, window styles) that are platform-specific.
 | |
| For example, Windows metafiles and Windows 95 taskbar icons have
 | |
| their own classes on Windows, but nowhere else. Because these classes
 | |
| are provided and are wxWidgets-compatible, it doesn't take much
 | |
| coding effort for an application programmer to add support for
 | |
| some functionality that the user on a particular platform might otherwise
 | |
| miss. Also, some classes that started off as platform-specific, such
 | |
| as the MDI classes, have been emulated on other platforms. I can imagine
 | |
| that even wxTaskBarIcon may be implemented for Unix desktops one day.
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| In other words, wxWidgets is not a 'lowest common denominator' approach,
 | |
| but it will still be possible to write portable programs using the
 | |
| core API. Forbidding some platform-specific classes would be a stupid
 | |
| approach that would alienate many potential users, and encourage
 | |
| the perception that toolkits such as wxWidgets are not up to the demands
 | |
| of today's sophisticated applications.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Currently resources such as bitmaps and icons are handled in a platform-specific
 | |
| way, but it is hoped to reduce this dependence in due course.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Another reason why wxWidgets is not a 'lowest common denominator' toolkit is that
 | |
| some functionality missing on some platform has been provided using generic,
 | |
| platform-independent code, such as the wxTreeCtrl and wxListCtrl classes.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="stl">Does wxWidgets use STL? or the standard string class?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| No. This is a much-discussed topic that has (many times) ended with the conclusion that it is in
 | |
| wxWidgets' best interests to avoid use of templates. Not all compilers can handle
 | |
| templates adequately so it would dramatically reduce the number of compilers
 | |
| and platforms that could be supported. It would also be undesirable to make
 | |
| wxWidgets dependent on another large library that may have to be downloaded and installed.
 | |
| In addition, use of templates can lead to executable bloat, which is something
 | |
| wxWidgets is strenuously trying to avoid.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| The standard C++ string class is not used, again because it is not available to all compilers,
 | |
| and it is not necessarily a very efficient implementation. Also, we retain more flexibility
 | |
| by being able to modify our own string class. Some compatibility with the string class
 | |
| has been built into wxString.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| There is nothing to stop an application using templates or the string class for its own
 | |
| purposes. With wxWidgets debugging options on, you may find you get errors when including
 | |
| STL headers. You can work around it either by switching off memory checking,
 | |
| or by adding this to a header before you include any STL files:<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <PRE>
 | |
| #ifdef new
 | |
| #undef new
 | |
| #endif
 | |
| </PRE>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="richedit">Is there a rich edit/markup widget for wxWidgets?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| These are the possibilities so far:<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <ul>
 | |
| <li>See <a href="http://www.scintilla.org" target=_top>www.scintilla.org</a> for
 | |
| a very nice syntax-highlighting editor widget. Robin Dunn has written a wxWidgets wrapper
 | |
| for this widget, available in the wxWidgets distribution under contrib/src/stc.
 | |
| <li>If you only need to display marked-up information, rather than edit it,
 | |
| then wxHTML will suit your needs. wxHTML is built into wxWidgets - please see the reference
 | |
| manual for details, and samples/html.
 | |
| <li>There are rich edit widgets in both WIN32 and GTK+, but there is currently
 | |
| no wxWidgets wrapper for these (but text attribute functions are being added in the wxWidgets 2.3.x series).
 | |
| </ul>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <h3><a name="exceptions">How to use C++ exceptions with wxWidgets?</a></h3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| wxWidgets library itself is unfortunately <i>not</i> exception-safe (as its
 | |
| initial version predates, by far, the addition of the exceptions to the C++
 | |
| language). However you can still use the exceptions in your own code and use
 | |
| the other libraries using the exceptions for the error reporting together with
 | |
| wxWidgets.
 | |
| 
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| There are a few issues to keep in mind, though:
 | |
| <ul>
 | |
|     <li>You shouldn't let the exceptions propagate through wxWidgets code,
 | |
|         in particular you should always catch the exceptions thrown by the
 | |
|         functions called from an event handler in the handler itself and not
 | |
|         let them propagate upwards to wxWidgets.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     <li>You may need to ensure that the compiler support for the exceptions is
 | |
|         enabled as, considering that wxWidgets itself doesn't use the
 | |
|         exceptions and turning their support on results in the library size
 | |
|         augmentation of 10% to 20%, it is turned off by default for a few
 | |
|         compilers. Moreover, for gcc (or at least its mingw version) you must
 | |
|         also turn on the RTTI support to be able to use the exceptions, so you
 | |
|         should use <tt>--disable-no_rtti --disable-no_exceptions</tt> options
 | |
|         when configuring the library (attention to the double negation).
 | |
| </ul>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="dev">How is wxWidgets being developed?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| We are using the <a href="cvs.htm">CVS</a> system to develop and maintain wxWidgets. This allows
 | |
| us to make alterations and upload them instantly to the server, from
 | |
| which others can update their source.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| To build source from CVS, see the file BuildCVS.txt in the top-level wxWidgets distribution
 | |
| directory.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="distrib">How is wxWidgets distributed?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| By ftp, and via the <a href="cdrom2.htm">wxWidgets CD-ROM</a>.
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| If you are feeling adventurous, you may also check out the sources directly
 | |
| from <a href="cvs.htm">cvs</a>.
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <!--
 | |
| <H3><a name="future">What are the plans for the future?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| TODO
 | |
| 
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| 
 | |
| -->
 | |
| 
 | |
| <h3><a name="base">What is wxBase?</a></h3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| wxBase is a subset of wxWidgets comprised by the non-GUI classes. It includes
 | |
| wxWidgets container and primitive data type classes (including wxString,
 | |
| wxDateTime and so on) and also useful wrappers for the operating system objects
 | |
| such as files, processes, threads, sockets and so on. With very minor
 | |
| exceptions wxBase may be used in exactly the same way as wxWidgets but it
 | |
| doesn't require a GUI to run and so is ideal for creating console mode
 | |
| utilities or server programs. It is also possible to create a program which can
 | |
| be compiled either as a console application (using wxBase) or a GUI one (using
 | |
| a full featured wxWidgets port).
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="univ">What is wxUniversal?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| The main difference between wxUniversal-based ports (such as wxX11, wxMGL) and other ports (such as wxMSW, wxGTK+, wxMac)
 | |
| is that wxUniversal implements all controls (or widgets) in
 | |
| wxWidgets itself thus allowing to have much more flexibility (for example, support for
 | |
| themes even under MS Windows). It also means that it is now much easier to
 | |
| port wxWidgets to a new platform as only the low-level classes must be ported
 | |
| which make for a small part of the library.
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| You may find more about wxUniversal <a href=wxuniv.htm>here</a>.
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="jave">What about Java?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| The Java honeymoon period is over :-) and people are realising that it cannot
 | |
| meet all their cross-platform development needs. We don't anticipate a major threat
 | |
| from Java, and the level of interest in wxWidgets is as high as ever.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="dotnet">What about .NET/Mono?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Microsoft is spending a lot on promoting the .NET initiative, which
 | |
| is a set of languages, APIs and web service components for Windows.
 | |
| Ximian has started an open source version of .NET, mostly for Linux.
 | |
| C# is Microsoft's alternative to Java, supporting 'managed code',
 | |
| garbage collection and various other Java-like language features.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Although this may be attractive to some developers, there
 | |
| is a variety of reasons why the .NET/Mono combination is unlikely
 | |
| to make wxWidgets redundant. Please note that the following comments
 | |
| are Julian Smart's opinions.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <ol>
 | |
| <li>Not everyone wants or needs net services.
 | |
| <li>C++ will be used for a long time to come; compared with C++, C# is a recent development and its future is not certain.
 | |
| <li>Mono Forms may only target Winelib (at least to begin with), so the end result is not as native as
 | |
| wxWidgets (I'm aware there is GTK# for use with the C# language).
 | |
| <li>C# is usually byte-compiled and therefore slower. Plus, .NET adds a layer of overhead to the client computer
 | |
| that wxWidgets does not require.
 | |
| <li>Mono hasn't proven its long-term viability yet (it's a complex system of components); wxWidgets is ready now.
 | |
| <li>You may not wish to buy into Microsoft marketing spin and APIs.
 | |
| <li>Microsoft may at some point sue developers of non-Microsoft .NET implementations. After all,
 | |
| platform-independence is not in Microsoft's interest.
 | |
| <li>.NET might never be implemented on some platforms, especially Mac and embedded variants of Linux.
 | |
| <li>wxPython and other language variants provide further reasons for wxWidgets to continue.
 | |
| <li>The same issue exists for Qt: if Qt sales remain strong, it's a good indication that
 | |
| the market for a C++-based approach is still there. (Either that, or everyone's turning to wxWidgets!)
 | |
| </ol>
 | |
| 
 | |
| There is nothing to stop folk from developing a C# version of the wxWidgets API;
 | |
| we already have bindings to Python, Perl, JavaScript, Lua, Basic, and Eiffel.
 | |
| Update: a <a href="http://wxnet.sourceforge.net/" target=_new>wx.NET</a> project is now in progress.
 | |
| 
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="help">How can I help the project?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Please check out the <a href="http://www.wxwidgets.org/develop2.htm">Community</a> pages,
 | |
| in particular the <a href="projects.htm">suggested projects</a>, and
 | |
| mail the developers' mailing list with your own suggestions.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| <H3><a name="newport">How do I start a new port?</a></H3>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Please subscribe to the wx-dev <a href="maillst2.htm">developers' mailing list</a> and
 | |
| ask if anyone else is interested in helping with the port, or
 | |
| has specific suggestions. Also please read the <a href="standard.htm">coding standards</a>.
 | |
| 
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| Each port consists of a platform-specific part (e.g. src/msw, include/wx/msw),
 | |
| a generic set of widgets and dialogs for when the port doesn't support
 | |
| them natively (src/generic, include/wx/generic) and the common code
 | |
| that all ports use (src/common, include/wx). By browsing the source
 | |
| you should get a good idea of the general pattern.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Take a port that most closely matches your port, and strip out
 | |
| the implementation so you have a skeleton port that compiles. Ask on wx-dev
 | |
| first for the wxStubs port - however, any such predefined skeleton
 | |
| port may be out of date, so make a judgement on whether to use it.
 | |
| Perhaps it will still save you time to clean up wxStubs, and
 | |
| others may benefit from this too.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| You will need to define a symbol for the new port, e.g. __WXXBOX__.
 | |
| Look at files such as wx/defs.h, wx/wxchar.h for areas where you'll
 | |
| need to add to existing conditionals to set up wide character
 | |
| support and other issues. If the GUI runs on a Unix variant,
 | |
| define the __UNIX__ variable in your makefile.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Then you can start implementing the port, starting with
 | |
| wxWindow, wxTopLevelWindow, wxFrame, wxDialog so you
 | |
| can get the minimal sample running as soon as possible.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| If GDI objects (wxPen, wxBrush, etc.) are not concepts in your
 | |
| native GUI, you may wish to use very generic versions of
 | |
| some of these - see the wxX11 port.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Consider using the wxUniversal widget set as a quick way
 | |
| to implement wxWidgets on your platform. You only need
 | |
| to define some basic classes such as device contexts,
 | |
| wxWindow, wxTopLevelWindow, GDI objects etc. and
 | |
| the actual widgets will be drawn for you. See wxX11,
 | |
| wxMGL, and wxMSW/Univ for sample wxUniversal ports.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| To begin with, you can use whatever makefiles or project
 | |
| files work for you. Look at existing makefiles to see what
 | |
| generic/common/Unix files need to be included. Later, you'll want to integrate support
 | |
| for your port into configure (Unix-like systems and gcc under Windows),
 | |
| and bakefile (for other makefiles on Windows).<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Submit your port as patches via SourceForge; you might
 | |
| wish to separate it into one patch that touches common headers
 | |
| and source files, and another containing the port-specific code, to make
 | |
| it much easier for us to review and apply the patches.<P>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Good luck!
 | |
| 
 | |
| </font>
 | |
| 
 | |
| </BODY>
 | |
| 
 | |
| </HTML>
 |