Amebis/wxWidgets
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

use hard coded default size for top level windows instead of CW_USEDEFAULT: this results in more decent default frame size and fixes initial wxMiniFrame size which used to be tiny 8*8 (and so fixes bug 817832)

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: https://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk@25622 c3d73ce0-8a6f-49c7-b76d-6d57e0e08775
This commit is contained in:
Vadim Zeitlin
2004-02-08 13:20:10 +00:00
parent c360bf5beb
commit 9cb57df493
1 changed files with 23 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
src/msw/window.cpp
View File

@@ -2952,15 +2952,17 @@ bool wxWindowMSW::MSWGetCreateWindowCoords(const wxPoint& pos,
int& x, int& y,
int& w, int& h) const
{
// yes, those are just some arbitrary hardcoded numbers
static const int DEFAULT_Y = 200;
static const int DEFAULT_W = 400;
static const int DEFAULT_H = 250;
bool nonDefault = FALSE;
if ( pos.x == -1 )
{
// if set x to CW_USEDEFAULT, y parameter is ignored anyhow so we can
// just as well set it to CW_USEDEFAULT as well
// if x is set to CW_USEDEFAULT, y parameter is ignored anyhow so we
// can just as well set it to CW_USEDEFAULT as well
x =
y = CW_USEDEFAULT;
}
@@ -2993,9 +2995,25 @@ bool wxWindowMSW::MSWGetCreateWindowCoords(const wxPoint& pos,
*/
if ( size.x == -1 )
{
// as above, h is not used at all in this case anyhow
w =
h = CW_USEDEFAULT;
// we don't use CW_USEDEFAULT here for several reasons:
//
// 1. it results in huge frames on modern screens (1000*800 is not
// uncommon on my 1280*1024 screen) which is way too big for a half
// empty frame of most of wxWindows samples for example)
//
// 2. it is buggy for frames with wxFRAME_TOOL_WINDOW style for which
// the default is for whatever reason 8*8 which breaks client <->
// window size calculations (it would be nice if it didn't, but it
// does and the simplest way to fix it seemed to change the broken
// default size anyhow)
//
// 3. there is just no advantage in doing it: with x and y it is
// possible that [future versions of] Windows position the new top
// level window in some smart way which we can't do, but we can
// guess a reasonably good size for a new window just as well
// ourselves
w = DEFAULT_W;
h = DEFAULT_H;
}
else
{