Amebis/wxWidgets
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Finished adding @tableofcontents to all overviews in the manual.

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: https://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk@72877 c3d73ce0-8a6f-49c7-b76d-6d57e0e08775
This commit is contained in:
Bryan Petty
2012-11-03 18:34:10 +00:00
parent 328a3a009f
commit 831e1028de
47 changed files with 518 additions and 852 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

84
docs/doxygen/overviews/thread.h
View File

@@ -15,50 +15,52 @@
@page overview_thread Multithreading Overview
Classes: wxThread, wxThreadHelper, wxMutex, wxCriticalSection, wxCondition, wxSemaphore
@section overview_thread_intro When to use multiple threads
@tableofcontents
wxWidgets provides a complete set of classes encapsulating objects necessary in
multithreaded (MT) programs: the wxThread class itself and different
multi-threaded (MT) applications: the wxThread class itself and different
synchronization objects: mutexes (see wxMutex) and critical sections (see
wxCriticalSection) with conditions (see wxCondition). The thread API in
wxCriticalSection) with conditions (see wxCondition). The thread API in
wxWidgets resembles to POSIX1.c threads API (a.k.a. pthreads), although several
functions have different names and some features inspired by Win32 thread API
are there as well.
These classes hopefully make writing MT programs easier and they also
provide some extra error checking (compared to the native - be it Win32 or
Posix - thread API), however it is still a non-trivial undertaking especially
for large projects.
Before starting an MT application (or starting to add MT
features to an existing one) it is worth asking oneself if there is no easier
and safer way to implement the same functionality.
Of course, in some situations threads really make sense (classical example is a
server application which launches a new thread for each new client), but in others
it might be an overkill.
On the other hand, the recent evolution of the computer hardware shows
an important trend towards multi-core systems, which are better exploited using
multiple threads (e.g. you may want to split a long task among as many threads
as many CPU (cores) the system reports; see wxThread::GetCPUCount).
These classes hopefully make writing MT programs easier and they also provide
some extra error checking (compared to the native - be it Win32 or Posix -
thread API), however it is still a non-trivial undertaking especially for large
projects. Before starting an MT application (or starting to add MT features to
an existing one) it is worth asking oneself if there is no easier and safer way
to implement the same functionality. Of course, in some situations threads
really make sense (classical example is a server application which launches a
new thread for each new client), but in others it might be an overkill. On the
other hand, the recent evolution of the computer hardware shows an important
trend towards multi-core systems, which are better exploited using multiple
threads (e.g. you may want to split a long task among as many threads as many
CPU (cores) the system reports; see wxThread::GetCPUCount).
To implement non-blocking operations @e without using multiple threads you have
two possible implementation choices:
- use wxIdleEvent (e.g. to perform a long calculation while updating a progress dialog)
- do everything at once but call wxWindow::Update() or wxApp::YieldFor(wxEVT_CATEGORY_UI)
periodically to update the screen.
If instead you choose to use threads in your application, please read also
the following sections of this overview.
@section overview_thread_notes Important notes for multithreaded applications
If instead you choose to use threads in your application, please read the
following section of this overview.
When writing a multi-threaded application, it is strongly recommended
that <b>no secondary threads call GUI functions</b>.
The design which uses one GUI thread and several worker threads which communicate
with the main one using @b events is much more robust and will undoubtedly save you
countless problems (example: under Win32 a thread can only access GDI objects such
as pens, brushes, device contexts created by itself and not by the other threads).
@see wxThread, wxThreadHelper, wxMutex, wxCriticalSection, wxCondition,
wxSemaphore
@section overview_thread_notes Important Notes for Multi-threaded Applications
When writing a multi-threaded application, it is strongly recommended that
<b>no secondary threads call GUI functions</b>. The design which uses one GUI
thread and several worker threads which communicate with the main one using
@b events is much more robust and will undoubtedly save you countless problems
(example: under Win32 a thread can only access GDI objects such as pens,
brushes, device contexts created by itself and not by the other threads).
For communication between secondary threads and the main thread, you may use
wxEvtHandler::QueueEvent or its short version ::wxQueueEvent. These functions
@@ -66,25 +68,23 @@ have a thread-safe implementation so that they can be used as they are for
sending events from one thread to another. However there is no built in method
to send messages to the worker threads and you will need to use the available
synchronization classes to implement the solution which suits your needs
yourself. In particular, please note that it is not enough to derive
your class from wxThread and wxEvtHandler to send messages to it: in fact, this
does not work at all.
You're instead encouraged to use wxThreadHelper as it greatly simplifies the
communication and the sharing of resources.
yourself. In particular, please note that it is not enough to derive your class
from wxThread and wxEvtHandler to send messages to it: in fact, this does not
work at all. You're instead encouraged to use wxThreadHelper as it greatly
simplifies the communication and the sharing of resources.
You should also look at the wxThread docs for important notes about secondary
threads and their deletion.
Last, remember that if wxEventLoopBase::YieldFor() is used directly or indirectly
(e.g. through wxProgressDialog) in your code, then you may have both re-entrancy
problems and also problems caused by the processing of events out of order.
To resolve the last problem wxThreadEvent can be used: thanks to its implementation
of the wxThreadEvent::GetEventCategory function wxThreadEvent classes in fact
do not get processed by wxEventLoopBase::YieldFor() unless you specify the
@c wxEVT_CATEGORY_THREAD flag.
Last, remember that if wxEventLoopBase::YieldFor() is used directly or
indirectly (e.g. through wxProgressDialog) in your code, then you may have both
re-entrancy problems and also problems caused by the processing of events out
of order. To resolve the last problem wxThreadEvent can be used: thanks to its
implementation of the wxThreadEvent::GetEventCategory function wxThreadEvent
classes in fact do not get processed by wxEventLoopBase::YieldFor() unless you
specify the @c wxEVT_CATEGORY_THREAD flag.
See also the @sample{thread} for a sample showing some simple interactions
between the main and secondary threads.
*/