use wxEMPTY_PARAMETER_VALUE to ensure that nested macro calls get correct number of parameters even when expdecl passed to the outer macro is empty (as happens in static builds)
git-svn-id: https://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk@42997 c3d73ce0-8a6f-49c7-b76d-6d57e0e08775
This commit is contained in:
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ expdecl wxVariant& operator << ( wxVariant &variant, const classname &value )\
|
|||||||
// implements a wxVariantData-derived class using for the Eq() method the
|
// implements a wxVariantData-derived class using for the Eq() method the
|
||||||
// operator== which must have been provided by "classname"
|
// operator== which must have been provided by "classname"
|
||||||
#define IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED(classname,expdecl) \
|
#define IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED(classname,expdecl) \
|
||||||
IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED_NO_EQ(classname,expdecl) \
|
IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED_NO_EQ(classname,wxEMPTY_PARAMETER_VALUE expdecl) \
|
||||||
\
|
\
|
||||||
bool classname##VariantData::Eq(wxVariantData& data) const \
|
bool classname##VariantData::Eq(wxVariantData& data) const \
|
||||||
{\
|
{\
|
||||||
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ bool classname##VariantData::Eq(wxVariantData& data) const \
|
|||||||
#define IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_SHALLOWCMP(classname) \
|
#define IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_SHALLOWCMP(classname) \
|
||||||
IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED_SHALLOWCMP(classname, wxEMPTY_PARAMETER_VALUE)
|
IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED_SHALLOWCMP(classname, wxEMPTY_PARAMETER_VALUE)
|
||||||
#define IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED_SHALLOWCMP(classname,expdecl) \
|
#define IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED_SHALLOWCMP(classname,expdecl) \
|
||||||
IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED_NO_EQ(classname,expdecl) \
|
IMPLEMENT_VARIANT_OBJECT_EXPORTED_NO_EQ(classname,wxEMPTY_PARAMETER_VALUE expdecl) \
|
||||||
\
|
\
|
||||||
bool classname##VariantData::Eq(wxVariantData& data) const \
|
bool classname##VariantData::Eq(wxVariantData& data) const \
|
||||||
{\
|
{\
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user