Add strike-through support to wxDataViewItem attributes

Implement support for this attribute only in the generic version so far,
it will hopefully be implemented for the natives ones in the future.

Also add a new toggle column to the dataview sample to check how it
works: checking the items in this column enables using this attribute
for some other ones.

Closes #18180.
This commit is contained in:
approach
2018-08-14 18:01:50 +02:00
committed by Vadim Zeitlin
parent e1a7f56040
commit 09124932eb
7 changed files with 81 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -336,10 +336,13 @@ MyListModel::MyListModel() :
// all the others are synthesized on request
static const unsigned NUMBER_REAL_ITEMS = 100;
m_toggleColValues.reserve(NUMBER_REAL_ITEMS);
m_textColValues.reserve(NUMBER_REAL_ITEMS);
m_toggleColValues.push_back(false);
m_textColValues.push_back("first row with long label to test ellipsization");
for (unsigned int i = 1; i < NUMBER_REAL_ITEMS; i++)
{
m_toggleColValues.push_back(false);
m_textColValues.push_back(wxString::Format("real row %d", i));
}
@@ -351,6 +354,7 @@ MyListModel::MyListModel() :
void MyListModel::Prepend( const wxString &text )
{
m_toggleColValues.insert( m_toggleColValues.begin(), 0 );
m_textColValues.Insert( text, 0 );
RowPrepended();
}
@@ -359,6 +363,11 @@ void MyListModel::DeleteItem( const wxDataViewItem &item )
{
unsigned int row = GetRow( item );
if (row >= m_toggleColValues.size())
return;
m_toggleColValues.erase( m_toggleColValues.begin()+row );
if (row >= m_textColValues.GetCount())
return;
@@ -374,7 +383,10 @@ void MyListModel::DeleteItems( const wxDataViewItemArray &items )
{
unsigned int row = GetRow( items[i] );
if (row < m_textColValues.GetCount())
{
wxASSERT(row < m_toggleColValues.size());
rows.Add( row );
}
}
if (rows.GetCount() == 0)
@@ -390,7 +402,10 @@ void MyListModel::DeleteItems( const wxDataViewItemArray &items )
// remaining indeces would all be wrong.
rows.Sort( my_sort_reverse );
for (i = 0; i < rows.GetCount(); i++)
{
m_toggleColValues.erase( m_toggleColValues.begin()+rows[i] );
m_textColValues.RemoveAt( rows[i] );
}
// This is just to test if wxDataViewCtrl can
// cope with removing rows not sorted in
@@ -409,6 +424,13 @@ void MyListModel::GetValueByRow( wxVariant &variant,
{
switch ( col )
{
case Col_Toggle:
if (row >= m_toggleColValues.size())
variant = false;
else
variant = m_toggleColValues[row];
break;
case Col_EditableText:
if (row >= m_textColValues.GetCount())
variant = wxString::Format( "virtual row %d", row );
@@ -470,8 +492,20 @@ bool MyListModel::GetAttrByRow( unsigned int row, unsigned int col,
{
switch ( col )
{
case Col_Toggle:
return false;
case Col_EditableText:
case Col_Date:
if (row < m_toggleColValues.size())
{
if (m_toggleColValues[row])
{
attr.SetColour( wxColour( *wxLIGHT_GREY ) );
attr.SetStrikethrough( true );
return true;
}
}
return false;
case Col_IconText:
@@ -482,6 +516,16 @@ bool MyListModel::GetAttrByRow( unsigned int row, unsigned int col,
break;
case Col_TextWithAttr:
if (row < m_toggleColValues.size())
{
if (m_toggleColValues[row])
{
attr.SetColour( wxColour( *wxLIGHT_GREY ) );
attr.SetStrikethrough( true );
return true;
}
}
case Col_Custom:
// do what the labels defined in GetValueByRow() hint at
switch ( row % 5 )
@@ -520,6 +564,13 @@ bool MyListModel::SetValueByRow( const wxVariant &variant,
{
switch ( col )
{
case Col_Toggle:
if (row >= m_toggleColValues.size())
return false;
m_toggleColValues[row] = variant.GetBool();
return true;
case Col_EditableText:
case Col_IconText:
if (row >= m_textColValues.GetCount())