diff --git a/include/stdex/stream.hpp b/include/stdex/stream.hpp
index 880df1896..1f8cd3151 100644
--- a/include/stdex/stream.hpp
+++ b/include/stdex/stream.hpp
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ namespace stdex
 		public:
 			basic(_In_ state_t state = state_t::ok) : m_state(state) {}
 
-			virtual ~basic() noexcept(false) {}
+			virtual ~basic() {}
 
 			///
 			/// Reads block of data from the stream
@@ -1852,17 +1852,20 @@ namespace stdex
 #endif
 			{}
 
-			virtual ~cache() noexcept(false)
+			virtual ~cache()
 			{
 				if (m_source) {
-					flush_cache();
-					if (!ok()) _Unlikely_
-						throw std::system_error(sys_error(), std::system_category(), "failed to flush cache"); // Data loss occurred
-					m_source->seekbeg(m_offset);
+					try {
+						flush_cache();
+						if (!ok()) _Unlikely_
+							throw std::system_error(sys_error(), std::system_category(), "failed to flush cache"); // Data loss occurred
+						m_source->seekbeg(m_offset);
 #if SET_FILE_OP_TIMES
-					m_source->set_atime(m_atime);
-					m_source->set_mtime(m_mtime);
+						m_source->set_atime(m_atime);
+						m_source->set_mtime(m_mtime);
 #endif
+					}
+					catch (...) {} // TODO: Never throw in destructors. If we'd throw here exception stack unwinding would std::terminate() our process anyway. Is there a way to catch this?
 				}
 			}
 
diff --git a/include/stdex/system.hpp b/include/stdex/system.hpp
index fd00ab414..a8da26f54 100644
--- a/include/stdex/system.hpp
+++ b/include/stdex/system.hpp
@@ -171,10 +171,12 @@ namespace stdex
 			return *this;
 		}
 
-		virtual ~basic_sys_object() noexcept(false)
+		virtual ~basic_sys_object()
 		{
-			if (m_h != TR::invalid_handle)
-				TR::close(m_h);
+			if (m_h != TR::invalid_handle) {
+				try { TR::close(m_h); }
+				catch (...) {}  // Failure to close a handle should not be that devastating as throwing in a destructor may be.
+			}
 		}
 
 		///
diff --git a/include/stdex/zlib.hpp b/include/stdex/zlib.hpp
index 3f6df3698..adc8c4536 100644
--- a/include/stdex/zlib.hpp
+++ b/include/stdex/zlib.hpp
@@ -61,20 +61,23 @@ namespace stdex
 
 		virtual ~zlib_writer()
 		{
-			m_zlib.avail_in = 0;
-			m_zlib.next_in = NULL;
-			do {
-				m_zlib.avail_out = m_block_size;
-				m_zlib.next_out = m_block.get();
-				throw_on_zlib_error(deflate(&m_zlib, Z_FINISH));
-				m_source->write(m_block.get(), m_block_size - m_zlib.avail_out);
-				if (!m_source->ok()) _Unlikely_
-					throw std::system_error(sys_error(), std::system_category(), "failed to flush compressed stream"); // Data loss occured
-			} while (m_zlib.avail_out == 0);
-			// m_zlib.avail_out = m_block_size;
-			// m_zlib.next_out = m_block.get();
-			// deflateReset(&m_zlib);
-			deflateEnd(&m_zlib);
+			try {
+				m_zlib.avail_in = 0;
+				m_zlib.next_in = NULL;
+				do {
+					m_zlib.avail_out = m_block_size;
+					m_zlib.next_out = m_block.get();
+					throw_on_zlib_error(deflate(&m_zlib, Z_FINISH));
+					m_source->write(m_block.get(), m_block_size - m_zlib.avail_out);
+					if (!m_source->ok()) _Unlikely_
+						throw std::system_error(sys_error(), std::system_category(), "failed to flush compressed stream"); // Data loss occured
+				} while (m_zlib.avail_out == 0);
+				// m_zlib.avail_out = m_block_size;
+				// m_zlib.next_out = m_block.get();
+				// deflateReset(&m_zlib);
+				deflateEnd(&m_zlib);
+			}
+			catch (...) {} // TODO: Never throw in destructors. If we'd throw here exception stack unwinding would std::terminate() our process anyway. Is there a way to catch this?
 		}
 
 		virtual _Success_(return != 0) size_t write(